| |
Author Affiliations: University Children's Hospital, Medical School Skopje, Macedonia (Lozanovski VJ); Department of Pediatric Nephrology, University Children's Hospital, Skopje, Medical School Skopje, Macedonia (Ristoska-Bojkovska N, Tasic V); Department of Biochemistry, Medical School, Skopje, Macedonia (Korneti P); Department of Pediatric Endocrinology and Genetics, University Children's Hospital, Skopje, Medical School Skopje, Macedonia (Gucev Z)
Corresponding Author: Vladimir J. Lozanovski, Universitätsklinik f¨¹r Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universität Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 132 E09, 69120 Heidelberg, Deutschland (Tel: +49 15 77 83 38 38 1; Email: v.lozanovski@yahoo.com)
Background: Oculocerebrorenal (Lowe) syndrome is an X-linked multisystem disease characterized by renal proximal tubulopathy, mental retardation, and congenital cataracts. We present a 19-year-old boy who was found to have low molecular weight proteinuria, hypercalciuria, mild generalized hyperaminoaciduria and intermittent microscopic hematuria at the age of 3.
Methods: Standard clinical and biochemical examinations and mutational analysis of the CLNC5 and OCRL1 gene were performed for the patient.
Results: The patient fulfilled diagnostic criteria for Dent disease, but lacked mutation in CLCN5. Sequencing of candidate genes revealed a mutation in his OCRL1 gene, which encodes for enzyme PIP2 5-phosphatase. The enzyme was not detected by western blot analysis, and decreased activity of the enzyme PIP2 5-phosphatase was observed in cultured skin fibroblasts. The boy had only mild mental retardation, mildly elevated muscle enzymes, but no neurological deficit or congenital cataracts, which are typical for Lowe syndrome.
Conclusions: Children with Dent phenotype who lack CLCN5 mutation should be tested for OCRL1 mutation. OCRL1 mutations may present with mild clinical features and are not necessarily associated with congenital cataracts.
Key words: cataracts; Dent disease; Lowe syndrome; OCRL1; CLCN5
World J Pediatr 2011;7(3):280-283
|
